Talk:Ika Omkara

This redirect is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

This page was proposed for deletion January 2005. The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ek Onkar. Joyous 02:29, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)

Merge with Aum

This article should not be Merged with Aum. Ek Onkar is distinct, although it does have a common basis in Aum, it means something different. 128.86.146.48 16:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issues referring to current version of article

ੴ is different than "Onkar" unlike the way this article in current form is trying to portray, please refer AGGS.
Furthermore, it would be wrong to say "Omkar" is a variant of ੴ or vice versa as Omkar refers to Trinity system in which Guru Nanak (the creator of the opening verse of Japji ੴ ) did not believe.
ੴ has nothing to do with Sanskrit like the article is portraying currently. Guru Nanak had rejected Sanskrit and rather chosen Punjabi for his work. The second letter in ੴ is "urra" a Punjabi letter. ---- A. S. Aulakh^Talk 23:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Ika Omkara → Ik Onkar — This page should be moved back to "Ik Onkar" as that is the overwhelmingly the most common transliteration of this Sikh tenet. Supposed inherent "-a"s are a nonfactor, every other Sikh article is titled correctly without them.--3swordz (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A quick google search confirms this also. I will make the move. Kingturtle (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]