Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary[edit]
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps[edit]
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers[edit]
Voicing an opinion on an item[edit]Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...[edit]
Please do not...[edit]
Suggesting updates[edit]There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
[edit]Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives
Sections
[edit]This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.
December 24
[edit]
December 24, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
Parker Solar Probe
[edit]Blurb: The Parker Solar Probe (pictured) makes its closest approach to the Sun (Post)
News source(s): NYT, Scientific American, BBC, Space
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Andi Fugard (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: We might also mention that it will be travelling at 430,000 miles per hour – a new speed record. But it's stormy as it's a solar maximum... Andrew🐉(talk) 08:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Still personally determining on notability, but oppose on quality - a two-sentence update to the lead is not enough to post. The Kip (contribs) 09:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article is already quite large and detailed but I've added an update about the timing of this perihelion to the body. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, as notable a solar space mission as you can get without landing. At least so far. Maybe post on the 27th when Parker is scheduled to send back information. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, the perihelion is today (Christmas Eve) around noon UTC. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Right, but we won't even know if it has survived the approach until the 27th. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The perihelion is today and it's in the news today. As and when we get further news, we can update the blurb accordingly. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I know, and if it were just you and I the blurb would be up already. Thanks for improving the article. Maybe a few others will come by and push this quickly over the finish line. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure how to intervene on this as I'm a new to ITN and don't want to break it :) The BBC cite notes that the temperatures that close will reach 1,400 °C and it will be moving faster than any other human-made object (692,000 kilometers per hour; 430,000 miles per hour). Maybe also something on how it has to act autonomously to ensure it is oriented in such as way that its shields protect it from the solar energy. At that distance from Earth, it would take about 8 minutes for a signal to get there and another 8 for it to be received: too slow for Earth-based control. Andi Fugard [they/them] (talk) 11:35, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I know, and if it were just you and I the blurb would be up already. Thanks for improving the article. Maybe a few others will come by and push this quickly over the finish line. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The perihelion is today and it's in the news today. As and when we get further news, we can update the blurb accordingly. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Right, but we won't even know if it has survived the approach until the 27th. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, the perihelion is today (Christmas Eve) around noon UTC. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
December 23
[edit]
December 23, 2024
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
RD: Shyam Benegal
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Economic Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Pachu Kannan (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Indian filmmaker. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Article is in good shape. Deserves attention. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article is lengthy and well sourced TheHiddenCity (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I have tagged the article with [citation needed] tags. Tagging Pharaoh of the Wizards and Pachu Kannan to see if they can fill some of those [citation needed] tags in preparation for homepage. Ktin (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
December 22
[edit]
December 22, 2024
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
|
RD: Qamruddin Ahmad Gorakhpuri
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Asr-e-Hazir, Millat Times, Eastern Crescent
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Khaatir (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
An Indian Muslim scholar and a professor of Hadith at Darul Uloom Deoband. Khaatir (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks well cited and comprehensive enough to post. However, the article would be much improved if his theological / academic views and theories were included. Abcmaxx (talk) 07:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
December 21
[edit]
December 21, 2024
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
Minas Gerais road crash
[edit]Blurb: Forty-one people are killed in a road crash involving a bus, a road train and a car in Minas Gerais, Brazil. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera The Guardian O Globo
Credits:
- Nominated by ArionStar (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Very high number of deaths. Help me to improve the article. ArionStar (talk) 16:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose until the article Isn't a draft or stub Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bloxzge 025: look at this now! ArionStar (talk) 11:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended content, unrelated to current nom |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- This is currently a one sentence stub, and was (correctly) moved to draft space. Natg 19 (talk) 16:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’ve re-opened this nomination as the lack of article isn’t a valid reason for closure.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor: is Draft:Minas Gerais road crash good enough? ArionStar (talk) 18:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Don't add too many citations just to prove the notability. See WP:CITATIONOVERKILL to understand how to add more citations. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 19:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1. The article is in draftspace, which should be enough to reject this nomination. 2. The draft article doesn't demonstrate passing WP:GNG, yet alone WP:ITNQUALITY. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not significant coverage? Aljazeera, CNN, The Guardian, Sky News? ArionStar (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNSIGNIF and WP:ITNQUALITY have not been met. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion about ArionStar is irrelevant; behavioral concerns should be reported to the relevant noticeboard. Concerns as to the sourcing are misguided, as it clearly passes GNG based on what's currently used alone. The article will soon be moved back into mainspace, so concerns regarding its draftification will be assuaged. It could, however, be longer, per WP:ITNQUALITY, as it is rather stubby atm. Conversely, per WP:ITNUPDATE, it's not far short of the traditional yardstick. --SerialNumber54129A New Face in Hell 19:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't pass the GNG or NEVENT yet. This is a burst of news coverage with no current indication of having a long term impact. It is a sadly large scale disaster but unlike many natural disasters or the like, there's not a current expectation there will be a lot of Followup coverage. — Masem (t) 00:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose for now page got deleted, but I will be happy to support it, if its back up and improved.- Support Article is short, but is notable, and looks well sourced TheHiddenCity (talk)
- @TheHiddenCity: the article is ready now. ArionStar (talk) 20:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: should have asked a page mover to move that page. You completely naused the histoire up. SerialNumber54129A New Face in Hell 21:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. I got it! ArionStar (talk) 21:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: should have asked a page mover to move that page. You completely naused the histoire up. SerialNumber54129A New Face in Hell 21:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment One of the worst road crashes in Brazil's history. ArionStar (talk) 23:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability, I've seen bus accidents of this scale not reported on ITN, but this seems to have got good coverage, (continued below)
Oppose on quality/ size. Thou tragic and widely reported, it is very short. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC) - Size is currently 1349 B (227 words).—Bagumba (talk) 06:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, significant accident, article is well sourced. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302, Bloxzge 025, and Bagumba: the article is bigger now. ArionStar (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Passes GNG. Also noting we posted a car cash in Magdeburg the other day. --SerialNumber54129A New Face in Hell 13:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I guess when the police catch the truck driver, we'll have some extra information to add. ArionStar (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it doesn't look at all good for the driver, whom the police have identified. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I guess when the police catch the truck driver, we'll have some extra information to add. ArionStar (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Commenting in mostly because I nominated the Magdeburg blurb—apples to oranges. Magdeburg's was a premeditated and (likely) politically-motivated attack, this was an accident. Yo.dazo (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Commenting in not mostly but wholly because other stuff exists. --SerialNumber54129A New Face in Hell 18:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The article is in good shape and well-referenced now. ArionStar (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Support in principle, oppose on qualityThis is a very notable accident by its record-breaking fatality count alone. However, article is pretty sparse and two-thirds of the Collision section rely on a single BBC article in Portuguese. In addition, it implies a certainty about the details of the accident when, as far as I can tell, there are multiple conflicting accounts as to what exactly happened. Yo.dazo (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)- Likely = possibly? ArionStar (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Could you possibly raise the "multiple conflicting accounts" at Talk:Minas Gerais road crash? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed, I think. Support. Yo.dazo (talk) 19:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support - the article is now in an appropriate state for posting. --RockstoneSend me a message! 21:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Question: Ready? ArionStar (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NEWSEVENT. Just a traffic accident on a road that has these regularly. The details seem unclear but the coverage is not lasting. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's exactly what Masem said: there's a follow-up coverage as a long term impact. ArionStar (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- If the event is not notable, do you think the article should be deleted? Exactly which details do you think need further clarification? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Don Martina
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NU
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Curaçaoan politician Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Joanne Pierce Misko
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times]
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by ForsythiaJo (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: One of the FBI's first two female agents. ForsythiaJo (talk) 03:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am not altogether sure this is not a case of WP:1E. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
December 20
[edit]
December 20, 2024
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(New) RD: Patrick Pillay
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.nation.sc/articles/24511/seychelles-mourns-the-loss-of-former-minister-patrick-pillay
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Jeromi Mikhael (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former minister and speaker of the National Assembly of Seychelles. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 04:48, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Shirish B. Patel
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Scroll.in
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian urban planner. Article can do with some expansion. Ktin (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted RD, blurb discussion continues) RD/Blurb: Rickey Henderson
[edit]Recent deaths nomination
Blurb: American baseball player Rickey Henderson dies at the age of 65. (Post)
News source(s): The Mercury News, NY Times, BBC News, The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by The Kip (talk · give credit)
- Updated by NorthernFalcon (talk · give credit) and Bagumba (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Baseball HOFer and all-time steals leader. The Kip (contribs) 19:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Article is GA. Doc Strange (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb GA and one of the greatest to ever play. Transformative and top of his field. DrewieStewie (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Extremely significant individual in a culturally significant sport. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Culturally significant in a few countries, such as United States, yes, but it's not globally. Just being a significant player of a popular sport is, in my opinion, not a particularly good reasoning for blurbing, the same way we don't blurb all significant British footballers or Indian cricketeers. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 18:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- British footballers or Indian cricketeers at the level of Rickey Henderson's importance to baseball get blurbs. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 23:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Baseball is a niche sport compared to football and cricket. Moreover, it's not true that British footballers or Indian cricketers of similar importance get blurbs. Bobby Charlton, who is widely considered one of the greatest players of all time and arguably the greatest English player ever, didn't get a blurb.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb Rickey Henderson isn't just the all-time steals leader; he's the all-time runs leader. On the basis of having scored more runs than anyone else ever, I support this obvious blurb. Regarding quality, it's already good enough quality to post. NorthernFalcon (talk) 00:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb per above. Article is GA. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- The GA review was from 2008.
It's got some outstanding uncited tags.—Bagumba (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)- Since resolved.—Bagumba (talk) 17:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Not Ready Unfortunately there are a significant number of CN tags that will need to be resolved. In its current state I doubt the GA status would survive a review.-Ad Orientem (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Addressed: Almost all the CN's have been resolved. The last one can be proven with a bit of research; one source demonstrates that only four people have even stolen more than 8 bases in a single postseason, and if you look up each of those cases none of them involves stealing more than eight in a single postseason series, other than Rickey. Nonetheless I haven't found a source that says it directly yet, so I'll try to fix that tomorrow if someone else doesn't first. NorthernFalcon (talk) 06:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ref has been added. SpencerT•C 09:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD Article has been improved. No need for a blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blurb Per above; quality article that demonstrates notability within field. SpencerT•C 09:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD, oppose blurb Notable individual with significant record, not uniquely transformative in his field though. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 10:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb. Not remotely the level of transformative that's required. — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rickey Henderson's success leading off with a walk- and power-heavy strategy was transformative. His base-stealing (100+ stolen bases in a season) was unprecedented. Both of these led in part to the analytical revolution, as folks were forced to analyze how impactful they were in reality (the stolen bases, less than folks thought. The walks,
- more). Baseball is played throughout North America and Wast Aia as well as parts of South America. That's 3 continents. Strict sound (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb not a transformative player, not a global massive sport. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If baseball isn’t a “globally massive sport,” that makes soccer virtually the only one. The Kip (contribs) 16:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- WP:ITNCDONT advises to not
Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country
, and baseball anyways is played in multiple countries. —Bagumba (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)- @Bagumba you understood my comment as you wished, since i'm not opposing it "because the event is only relating to a single country". I said it is not a global massive sport because it really isn't. It is played in some countries, but the level of social, cultural and economic impact and global following and breadth is concentrated in very few countries. Incomparable to soccer, basketball or even tennis. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- If we discourage opposition to blurbs for merely relating to only one country, why would we allow blurbs to be opposed for "only" relating to a few countries? —Bagumba (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- ITN does not limit itself to only internationally popular topics. We strive for a broad range of fields. Maybe not a very niche sport played by only a fraction of people in one country (for example, arean gridiron football), but baseball is definitely not that. Masem (t) 17:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is perfect for when we are talking about league finals or very important international tournaments (which are already ITNR and I'm fine with that), not for blurbing the deaths of players who are not the top of they field. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Completely fair to argue that Henderson was not top of his field (to me, his importance is in question, he was well known but not a legendary player), but we shouldn't be questioning the limited scope of their field. Masem (t) 18:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- we can question it, this is the forum to do so and it is a criterion for judging nominations on any topic. _-_Alsor (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Other baseball players have been blurbed, so the sport itself does not preclude posting. —Bagumba (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bill James, the legendary statistical analyst, said that if you cut Rickey Henderson in half, you would have 2 hall of farmers, his impact was so great. Strict sound (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Other baseball players have been blurbed, so the sport itself does not preclude posting. —Bagumba (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- we can question it, this is the forum to do so and it is a criterion for judging nominations on any topic. _-_Alsor (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Completely fair to argue that Henderson was not top of his field (to me, his importance is in question, he was well known but not a legendary player), but we shouldn't be questioning the limited scope of their field. Masem (t) 18:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is perfect for when we are talking about league finals or very important international tournaments (which are already ITNR and I'm fine with that), not for blurbing the deaths of players who are not the top of they field. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bagumba: I feel you're misunderstanding Alsor's argument here. While Baseball is central in American culture and popular in other countries like Japan, baseball in general is fairly unknown to the average person in Europe, Africa or South America. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 18:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- that's the point. _-_Alsor (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- So we wouldn't oppose baseball if it only related to one country like America, but it's also "popular in other countries", so we can oppose now? OK. You might want to check Category:Baseball in South America by country. There's plausible reasons to oppose, just not on the basis of the sport itself. —Bagumba (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, that is not what either what I or Alsor said and I honestly don't care for the ITN validity of any sport be it baseball, brännboll or swamp football.
- I can empathize if you feel strongly about baseball, but grossly simplifying the argument to "only relating to a single country" is just flawed reasoning. Being fairly unknown and not part of the broader culture doesn't mean there aren't people playing it just like there are people competing in soccer or brännball in the U.S. or American football in Sweden. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- And that’s a poor argument to make. If a sport has to be “globally massive” to be relevant here, that basically makes soccer the only one. Baseball’s popular across North and South America (there’s literally tons of Venezuelan/Colombian players???), the Caribbean, and east Asia; it most definitely isn’t a niche/one-country sport. The Kip (contribs) 03:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bagumba you understood my comment as you wished, since i'm not opposing it "because the event is only relating to a single country". I said it is not a global massive sport because it really isn't. It is played in some countries, but the level of social, cultural and economic impact and global following and breadth is concentrated in very few countries. Incomparable to soccer, basketball or even tennis. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that baseball isn't a major sport globally, and it's not even the most popular bat-and-ball game (it's cricket).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just because you are a cricket fan does not require you to deride baseball. In any case, under Recent Deaths there have neen numerous sporting figures mentioned, including snooker, which is a niche sport in comparison to baseball, by all measures. Strict sound (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t watch cricket at all, but it’s a fact that it’s more popular than baseball globally. Can you tell me the snooker player whose death got a blurb?--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I believe it was Terry Griffiths, but it could have been Silvino Francisco. Both in December. Strict sound (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- None of them got a blurb.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I believe it was Terry Griffiths, but it could have been Silvino Francisco. Both in December. Strict sound (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t watch cricket at all, but it’s a fact that it’s more popular than baseball globally. Can you tell me the snooker player whose death got a blurb?--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just because you are a cricket fan does not require you to deride baseball. In any case, under Recent Deaths there have neen numerous sporting figures mentioned, including snooker, which is a niche sport in comparison to baseball, by all measures. Strict sound (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that baseball isn't a major sport globally, and it's not even the most popular bat-and-ball game (it's cricket).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality, namely those are huge quotes in the legacy section which verves on being a copyright problem. Masem (t) 12:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Masem: The quotes of copyrighted text have been reduced. The page subject, Henderson, is still heavily quoted, but his spoken words are not copyrighted. The "Legacy" section still has {{Over-quotation}}, but that it is a yellow tag, and not an WP:ITNQUALITY show stopper. —Bagumba (talk) 05:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb Great player? Yes. Transformative in his field? No. Black Kite (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What definition of “transformative” does he fail to meet? In his field; he was so unique and redefined base stealing. Many sources back that up and cite that as why he’s arguably the greatest to ever play. If that’s not transformative in his field, I don’t know what is. DrewieStewie (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- How exactly did he "redefine base stealing"? 31.44.227.152 (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb. When it comes to sports (among other topics) only the best of the best should get blurbs. While Henderson is undoubtedly the best base stealer, he is not one of the best overall baseball players. Blurbs should be reserved for Willie Mays and other players of his caliber. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I get that baseball can be a complex sport, but the point of baseball is to score more runs than the other team, and Henderson scored more runs than anybody else. Does that not make him one of the best overall baseball players to ever play? Furthermore, at the time of his death, no living baseball player had more WAR than him other than the steroid users. Again, does that not make him at a minimum the greatest of his generation? NorthernFalcon (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Putting aside how only giving the total number of runs could imply almost anything from an incredibly high mode/range to a higher-than-usual mean, and how WAR isn't even mentioned in Henderson's article, or Henderson in the WAR article for that matter, I feel like it's still not clear why Henderson would be a major figure full stop, and not just a major figure in baseball. Per WP:ITNRDBLURB, being included in Recent Deaths feels like it's enough for this case. Yo.dazo (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD, neutral on blurb Sourcing issues have been resolved. One yellow tag on excessive quotes from the subject, Henderson, but its not the red or orange variety that would be an WP:ITNQUALITY issue.—Bagumba (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral blurb – Very good quality article that really goes all out on his significance, but the added content related to his death is still too limited for a blurb I think. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb He was definitely a great player, but not influential for a blurb. Furthermore, he wasn't a household name outside of baseball (to be honest, he wasn't Willie Mays in any sense). The "Legacy" section doesn't make a strong case for a blurb either, as it primarily consists of specialist opinions about stealing and sliding abilities as well as his career achievements, not signifying any societal or cultural impact.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb Rickey was an excellent baseball player who received many awards and recognition. TheApex150 (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mark ready Seems at least to be ready for RD.—Bagumba (talk) 11:08, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD,
weakoppose blurb Article still has some very long quotations, but it's (probably barely) not excessively so. However, speaking as not-a-follower of baseball, this feels like a situation where the impact is very much limited to people "in the know", and thus is not really blurbworthy. Yo.dazo (talk) 13:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Changed after more consideration with WP:ITNRDBLURB. I'll grant that he was one of the best baseball players out there, but he also died
normallypeacefully, and he's not the Dalai Lama. Yo.dazo (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Changed after more consideration with WP:ITNRDBLURB. I'll grant that he was one of the best baseball players out there, but he also died
- Posted to RD since there is consensus for at least that much. Blurb discussion can continue. Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support RD and blurb Definately well sourced for RD. I think the holder of the stolen bases record is transformative and influential enough in his field to just get him over the line to blurb status. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 16:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose blurb, not widely known outside US. Sandstein 22:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not supporting a blurb- I don't love blurbing 99.9% of deaths- but the "Not transformative" argument is nothing short of ridiculous. He took one of the things important enough to be one of the sport's "five tools"- speed- and utilized it better than anyone else ever has, and probably better than anyone else ever will. (If you took the Major League-leading steals total from 2024, and had that total for 20 seasons, you'd still be short of Rickey.) He also scored more runs- you know, the entire point of the sport- than anyone in history. If you want to go by Wins Above Replacement, he's 19th all-time (14th among batters), and 4th (3rd) among players from the past 45 years- the only people above him were steroid users. He is, no matter how you look at him, one of the greatest baseball players ever. -- Kicking222 (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Did somebody change the blurb to remove any word like 'transformative' which earlier was there? It is confusing for editors who didn't see this earlier. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- We would never have transformative in a blurb, it was never there. Stephen 07:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now: I did a spot-check on the references in a small slice of about 5-10% of the article prose and encountered four apparent instances of WP:OR. Last peer review was in 2010, so I suspect a great deal of OR has crept into the article since then. If anyone wants to help clean up, stats sites/databases tend to be common OR culprits on athlete articles. Left guide (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support blurb, most major league steals (by 50% over next player), most runs scored, most unintentional walks, and over 3,000 hits. All that and he could field too. In runs scored and steals alone he transformed the game into personal career records never seen before. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: George Eastham
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times of India
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: 1966 world cup winning Footballer Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not Quite Ready A handful of CN tags. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Rey Misterio
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Bleacher Report, People
Credits:
- Nominated by Spworld2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Mexican professional wrestler and trainer, Rey Mysterio Sr, uncle of WWE legend, dies at 66 Spworld2 (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not Ready for the usual reason. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
(Ready) RD: Om Prakash Chautala
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hindu, The Indian Express
Credits:
- Nominated by ExclusiveEditor (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Fylindfotberserk (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Former Chief Minister of Haryana, served the most terms, three days mourning in the state, former head of an Indian state. The article is now well cited. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 08:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Short but adequate. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- No footnote for DoB in main prose. There is quite a bit of prose on his legal troubles, but not much on his work as Chief Minister for 5+ years, President of his political party for 24 years and Leader of Opposition in the Haryana Legislative Assembly for 9+ years. What did he do while in office? --PFHLai (talk) 11:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Short article, seems to have only reached subnational leadership. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 23:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Royal Autumn Crest: Subnational leadership is not a reason to deny ITN. His post is equivalent to that of a governor in United States. He is well documented in sources, only if somebody could expand it. However there is no specific rule for having a long article for inclusion in RD. Look at Macoto Takahashi for example. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Royal Autumn Crest Please read the notice about how recent deaths works:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support meets WP:ITNQUALITY (noting that DoB is now sourced in prose). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Ann Hartley
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Former Labour MP, North Shore mayor Ann Hartley dies
Credits:
- Nominated by Schwede66 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Muso555 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Looks nearly ready; some minor referencing is needed. Schwede66 23:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Her election record has been well presented in prose, but where is the coverage on her work while in office? --PFHLai (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- @PFHLai: It's simply not there, you can help by adding it. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm helping RD, and wondering if this nom is a good candidate for RD. The thin coverage of her work activities is giving me pause. Not to mention the few {cn} tags. --PFHLai (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @PFHLai: It's simply not there, you can help by adding it. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have added more info and sources to take care of the cn tags. Unfortunately most content from the 1980s and 1990s written about her is offline. Kiwichris (talk) 08:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024 Magdeburg car attack
[edit]Blurb: Five people are killed and at least 205 are injured in a car attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany. (Post)
News source(s): AP News, ARD, BBC, Reuters
Credits:
- Nominated by Yo.dazo (talk · give credit)
- Created by Gianluigi02 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by ElijahPepe (talk · give credit) and CommissarDoggo (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: There aren't that many details as of yet, but it is already being heavily covered. Saxony-Anhalt minister-president already announced casualty figures and general info on perpetrator. Yo.dazo (talk) 20:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is obviously a very significant event. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Wait We are not a news ticker and we know next to nothing other than that something has happened and at least one person has been killed.-Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support based on recent developments and a clearer picture of the event. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mayor of Magdeburg just confirmed over 50 injured. Khuft (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support 11 died now Braganza (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is false. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until expansion and more ramifications are known. We are not a news ticker. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 21:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait We don't yet know the exact extent of the attack. In any case the article needs more time before it is ready to be posted. Gust Justice (talk) 21:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support At this point the event is clearly notable enough for ITN. It has received significant coverage in many sources, and it seems similar to 2016 Berlin truck attack in scope and significance (although the motive appears to be different). That event was also posted on ITN back then. Gust Justice (talk) 12:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Made altblurb into blurb because they're pretty much the same, just with updated info. Yo.dazo (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support There's no doubt it's significant now, it must be on the front page Fishthatflies (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per widespread coverage and severity of attack TansoShoshen (talk) 01:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support lots of coverage, high death toll, pretty rare and interesting attack Personisinsterest (talk) 04:06, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- only two dead? 68 injured, sure, but I don't think this is enough for the front page absent anything more. --RockstoneSend me a message! 05:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Edit: I'm still not convinced this would be posted if it happened in North America, but with 5 deaths and the strange circumstances, I don't necessarily oppose posting anymore. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 19:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*Oppose pretty much per Rockstone. Starting to believe we're once again missing the mark here and letting pro-Western bias influence when we believe to be notable or not. A tragic event, but for the sorts of events that we've considered, this is not all that extreme. Same goes for the shooting nom directly below this one. DarkSide830 (talk) 05:26, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Struck my vote with revised numbers. I have no issue with this having been posted. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment When considering whether an ITN nom is significant we can weigh separate things, whether the news is receiving significant coverage outside the incident region, whether it is unique therein and whether it is likely to any have lasting coverage. While the first can be answered in the affirmative, for the next two we will have to say no especially when you look at the listings at Terrorism in Germany#List of significant terrorist incidents in Germany. We also unfortunately have to say the death toll is not sifinificant at this point in time, consider for e.g. List of traffic collisions (2000–present) which bears a minimum 5 casualties. For a comparision, there is a reason we stopped posting most school shootings in the US which were seen to be frequent and without lasting encyclopedic impact (WP:10YEARS) as evinced by the massive lists at Lists of school shootings in the United States. Gotitbro (talk) 06:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think the comparison with US school shootings is unfair given that Category:Vehicular rampage in Germany has only seven articles on it, and among them there are only three with comparably high casualties: 2016 Berlin truck attack, 2020 Volkmarsen ramming attack, and this one. (Also, casualties are not the same as fatalities.) Many in the list of significant terrorist incidents in Germany also have low or zero deaths and injuries. All this to say that the significance here is not just in numbers: this was a vehicular attack at a Christmas market by a lone perpetrator who was critical of Islam, both echoing and contrasting the one at Berlin in 2016. Yo.dazo (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: I think I very much know of the so-called western bias, and I think it is something that doesn't apply here (although I may have personal bias of seeing Christmas based vehicle attack the first time). The page has been well extended, and 68 injuries with 2 deaths is something people should not take that casually. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:36, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Article in good state, making global news and it is a significant event. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support worldwide news and significant attack by any measure applied. Unconvinced by WP:MINIMUMDEATHS and WP:BIAS arguments; the number of deaths is not the main criteria for posting and that should never be a measure of notability. We routinely post non-routine tragic events in other parts of the world, if they don't get posted it's usually due to quality and lack of WP:RS and not notability. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on principle (appears to be a race-motivated attack and borders on terrorism, rather than a more domestic crime) but Oppose on quality. The Aftermath and Reaction sections are almost not significant enough to be needed, we do not need the halfdozen-some lines of "thoughts and prayers" from various leaders. The rest of the article seems fine, but these section stick out a unnecessary fluff for an even article. --Masem (t) 13:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- As of this comment, the aftermath and reaction sections look pretty tame tame to me. Maybe they were more bloated when you were looking at them. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Attempted to condense them. I know full well though that those sections will remain a bit of a mess for weeks (or maybe even months, if this attack does end up influencing the federal elections.) Such is the fate of ongoing articles, I suppose. Yo.dazo (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Suitable for ITN and the top news story for many media outlets today.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support There's big coverage of this story and many lines of intrigue including the Saudi suspect's unusual anti-Islam stance, his wanted status in his home country and the kingdom's failed attempt to extradite him. [1] Of course those are too nuanced to be in our headline, but let's give the people the news story they're actually looking up. This story is more than just senseless bloodshed. Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 22:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
2024 Zagreb school stabbing
[edit]Blurb: In Zagreb, one child is killed, and seven others are injured in a school stabbing. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, CBS
Credits:
- Nominated by Jalapeño (talk · give credit)
🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 18:23, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, as a national day of mourning has been called in the country. This is obviously a very significant event. Hijérovīt | þⰁč 19:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support in principle. Article looks good to go too.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, as a national day of mourning has been called in the country. This is obviously a very significant event. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undoubtedly a tragedy. But a single death by violence, even in Europe, is just setting the bar too low for ITN. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to add the same caution here, in that the person was suffering from mental health issues, which generally means the crimes are not seen as severe compared to those that are committed by more rationale persons. --Masem (t) 01:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support pretty rare to see something like this happening in Europe, and 8 casualties is alot Personisinsterest (talk) 04:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - mental health issue, and only a single death. We wouldn't post a similar stabbing in the US or Canada. --RockstoneSend me a message! 05:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Data on how common are these in Croatia-specific may lead to more constructive discussion. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose While tragic and a rare incident in Croatia, we have almost never posted an attack with a single death (unless the deceased is notable themselves) and we shouldn't now. The article also proceeds to call this a massacre which is quite a stretch. Gotitbro (talk) 07:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unconvinced by WP:MINIMUMDEATHS arguments; the number of deaths is not the main criteria for posting and that should never be a measure of notability. This doesn't look to be routine either and the article looks to be in good shape. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- MINIMMUMDEATHS is a controversial subject about which there is currently no strong consensus. It is neither affirmed, nor proscribed as an argument in any of our WP:PG. As such it is perfectly legitimate for editors to take into consideration the death toll of events being considered for ITN, until/unless such time as some sort of broad consensus forms one way or another and we are able to put it into a guideline. Of course editors are equally free to disagree with such arguments, and in those cases we go with the local consensus on a case by case basis for each nomination. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Gotitbro and Rockstone. The Kip (contribs) 19:57, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
December 19
[edit]
December 19, 2024
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Needs reviewers) RD: Gaboro
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:
- Nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Swedish rapper, murder victim. Article looks in good shape. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Francisco Nemenzo Jr.
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Philstar
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Filipino political scientist, educator Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- CitationS Needed: A lots of. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Abhkaz parliament shooting
[edit]Blurb: Adgur Kharazia shoots political rivals Vakhtang Golandzia and Kan Kvartchia, killing and injuring them respectively outside the Abhkaz parliament. (Post)
Alternative blurb: A shooting occurs inside the People's Assembly of Abkhazia, killing one lawmaker and injuring another.
News source(s): Al Jazeera, The Moscow Times
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Abcmaxx (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Breaking news, its made world headlines, unusual event. Please don't comment on article quality until its had a chance to expand. The options involved need articles and major expansion too. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Abkhazia is not a fully recognised sovereign state and isn't particularly well known to most people.
so I think it'd be prudent to also include that it's a region within the country of Georgiait's in essentially the same contested status as Crimea after the Russian invasion in 2008. Regardless, I think adding additional information to help people understand roughly where on Earth this has happened is needed. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC) - Oppose: Abhkazia isn't a real country, it's a Russian proxy-state, the People's Assembly is only recognized by four countries. We shouldn't be posting updates about it to ITN. For example, we didn't post about the 2024 Abkhazian protests, which resulted in the collapse and resignation of Abkhazia's government. Scuba 15:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see why the political status of this place would be a factor. Surely if the mayor of Buffalo killed his opponent while running for Governor, it would be successfully nominated here - and I doubt anyone would claim that the murder of one's opponent isn't ITN because New York State isn't a country. Nfitz (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, but you're missing the fact this would be if the Canadian pretend government of Buffalo had a former mayor shoot members of the city council. It's just a normal murder, but the people involved are LARPing as politicians. Scuba 05:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also this may be controversial to say but something like this happening in Buffalo would be such an extraordinary event in a fully integrated part of the world's dominant superpower that it would automatically be more notable than this happening in a tiny region occupied by the Russian army. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see why the political status of this place would be a factor. Surely if the mayor of Buffalo killed his opponent while running for Governor, it would be successfully nominated here - and I doubt anyone would claim that the murder of one's opponent isn't ITN because New York State isn't a country. Nfitz (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support pending article’s expansion. A politician shooting other politicians is very unusual, and the story appears to be in headlines across news outlets. I also subscribe to the opinion that the political status of Abkhazia is completely irrelevant.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a real country per Scuba. It's currently a two sentence stub. And to the extent it is getting news coverage, it's clearly not a major item. Politically motivated acts of violence are a near daily occurrence in the world. I'm not seeing anything that makes this stand out. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support in principle but obviously quality is not there yet. Stub has even less information than the blurb. Khuft (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now I'd actually argue that this may be relevant for ITN precisely because it is about separatist politics that may or may not have local and diplomatic consequences. But the relevant articles are currenly stubs, and there's not much coverage from other sources. Yo.dazo (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, a fatal attack on any legislature is newsworthy let alone one where the suspect is a legislator thereof
- Support on notability, Oppose on quality A long-serving and seemingly-respected mayor of a capital city publicly murdering his own political rival himself in broad daylight is an extremely unusual event, especially given it happened at the parliament building itself - however, the article is barely a stub. The Kip (contribs) 20:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability, sure political assassinations happen a lot but not directly by a sitting politician. There are few partially recognised states in the world such that the bar shouldn’t be much higher for news coming from them
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. Extremely rare event: high-level political assassination by a politician. While Abkhazia is not well-recognized, it is de facto a sovereign state, thus making this not much different in terms of notability than the federal politics of a well-recognized state. However, the article is only 2 sentences long, and thus nowhere near substantial enough to blurb. -insert valid name here- (talk) 00:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- support seems very notable. If something like this happened in the US, France, or China, there would be no question as to if it should be posted. I see no reason as to why it shouldnt be posted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:8d80:562:a38f:9aca:9cef:3ee:598c (talk) 00:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment — The blurb does not state that Kharazia is a suspect. I have added an alternative blurb. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on Notability but Oppose on quality This is definitely notable enough for ITN however article is still a stub and is nowhere near to being posted TNM101 (chat) 06:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Armed dispute between collaborators in a glorified Russian military district. Really not internationally notable at all. If this happened in the Georgian parliament it would be notable. Also the article is very poor and articles about Abkhazian politics are generally not in good condition. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Those making claims that this isn't notable because Abkhazia is a Russian proxy-state created in 2008 shouldn't forget that it's been an autonomous republic continuously since 1921. At that time, the majority of today's countries didn't have any form of autonomy. This doesn't mean that Abkhazia isn't part of Georgia, but its status hasn't changed a lot with the Russo-Georgian War.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support in principle – Article is too short at the moment. Also, all the comments saying it's not news because it's Russian occupied doesn't make the news any less significant. You can disagree with Abkhazia's political status but that does not minimize notability. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 16:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality and quality alone. I do think those seeking to downplay this event seem to not understand how uncommon it is for someone to just shoot your political rival in broad daylight, at least in modern society where we frown on duels (Looking at you Aaron Burr). The exact impacts of this? Hard to tell, but I don't think the legal status of the country should matter, we're talking about two persons who had some level of power, acknowledgment nonwithstanding. DarkSide830 (talk) 05:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on size per above, Oppose both blurb and alt-blurb. If it is posted then the partially recognized status of Abkhazia should be noted. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 06:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: How about posting Vakhtang Golandzia to RD? That's a bad idea, but so posting 2024 Parliament of Abkhazia shooting. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support on notability. Article needs serious work though. DannyC55 (Talk) 22:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Michael Leunig
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:
- Nominated by Stephen (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian cartoonist Stephen 12:35, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Somebody has marked various [citation needed], once they are fixed it is good to go. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) Mazan Rape trial
[edit]Blurb: Dominique Pelicot and 46 other men are convicted of the mass rape of Gisèle Pelicot (Post)
Alternative blurb: Dominique Pelicot and 50 other men are convicted of the mass rape of Gisèle Pelicot
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Yorkshiresky (talk · give credit)
- Created by Sunuraju (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Southdevonian (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: International reporting. Of huge significance to those campaigning against sexual violence in France and elsewhere. 51 men were convicted of sexual crimes, but unsure how best to convey the nuance of these in a blurb. yorkshiresky (talk) 10:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, worldwide notable 2804:388:4125:E522:1:0:7D84:2D89 (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please elaborate. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: there is an ongoing WP:RM to move to "Mass rape of Gisèle Pélicot". I suspect most people are more familiar with her name than with the location. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - the BBC wording is "50 men sentenced in mass rape trial", Le Monde "All 51 defendants found guilty of rape or sexual assault", NYT "50 Others Guilty". I think that the blurb should express that it was Dominique Pelicot + 50. Turini2 (talk) 11:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am concerned at the excessive level of detail of the trial events. In most cases of such trials, we aim to summarize key points, not a day-by-day documenting which that is approaching. --Masem (t) 13:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support This case has been covered by the media across the world and the article is of good quality. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 14:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Major case in France also receiving attention beyond the country. A better with more context might be needed (country etc). Gotitbro (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Been in the news internationally. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support, propose altblurb - I support the article's inclusion for quality (significant prose, well cited) and notability, but propose an altblurb to correct the number of men sentenced (see above). Also curious about rewording depending on the conclusion of the
RFCRM. ~Malvoliox (talk - Support, important trial in France that also echoes in other countries, with big international reach in media. --Cart (talk) 20:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 00:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Stephen: Gisèle Pelicot is an article itself. 2804:1B3:9700:9FC1:1184:91FC:CF68:64EE (talk) 01:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Agree that we could tag her article as well (though keep the article on the trial the bold link) ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 02:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Graças 2804:14C:87E0:815E:2053:FD00:6B97:E25A (talk) 08:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Stephen: Gisèle Pelicot is an article itself. 2804:1B3:9700:9FC1:1184:91FC:CF68:64EE (talk) 01:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think the rapes perpetrated upon Mme. Pelicot were serial rapes, not a mass rape or mass rapes. Compare with mass killing vs. serial killings. I see someone above notes the BBC's use of mass rape trial but I think there, mass refers to the number of defendants on trial rather than the number of times she was raped. —71.105.243.101 (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I would also say the description "mass rape" gives an inaccurate idea. Kingsif (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
December 18
[edit]
December 18, 2024
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
RD: Slim Dunlap
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Billboard
Credits:
- Nominated by 240F:7A:6253:1:64BD:B9FD:6602:C395 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Mookie89 (talk · give credit) and Mehendri Solon (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Guitarist for The Replacements. 240F:7A:6253:1:64BD:B9FD:6602:C395 (talk) 08:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
(New) Mumbai boat accident
[edit]Blurb: 15 people are killed when an Indian Navy craft collides with a passenger ferry off the coast of Mumbai, India. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, CNN, BBC
Credits:
- Created and nominated by Introvert Inside (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: An unusual accident that resulted in a significant no. of deaths. Introvert Inside (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for now : Article needs to be improved Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate in what way you want the article to be improved? Introvert Inside (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well theres only two sections and there's little information about the ferry and craft. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 05:38, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate in what way you want the article to be improved? Introvert Inside (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Sigrid Kehl
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): VRT
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Created by LouisAlain (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Operatic singer, first mezzo then dramatic soprano, for more than 35 years "voice and face of the Leipzig Opera", then in East Germany, but she was one of the few who could also perform in Naples, Vienna, Geneva ... Unusually, she performed both Fricka and Brünnhilde in the same legendary Ring production, in her transition to soprano. The article was there, prepared by a good version in German, but references had to be applied and retrieved. Last addition after seeking help from Benutzer:Brodkey65. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: coverage seems thorough, supported by diverse sources --PaulBetteridge (talk) 16:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Article is in good shape. --ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 06:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above TheHiddenCity (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 09:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: Rik Van Looy
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): VRT
Credits:
- Nominated by Fram (talk · give credit)
- Updated by LM383 (talk · give credit), Honziczek (talk · give credit) and Normantas Bataitis (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Article still needs work despite the 34 references. Borderline blurb-worthy, one of the all-time greatest cyclists (2 times world champion, 2nd most professional wins, won all classics), but would be nice to at least get him into RD. Fram (talk) 15:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Quite a few footnote-free paragraphs in the prose. Date and place of birth are in the infobox, but no sources were provided (these should be footnoted in the main prose). The Records section has no sources. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 11:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
RD: John Marsden
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by 31.44.227.152 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Laterthanyouthink (talk · give credit) and Erksahin (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Australian writer. 31.44.227.152 (talk) 13:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Perry J. Dahl
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Neptune Society
Credits:
- Nominated by Toadboy123 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American flying ace during World War II Toadboy123 (talk) 01:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The death was on December 2, and is thus not recent. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- @MtPenguinMonster: was only announced on 17 December though. Abcmaxx (talk) 11:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - a very fine article ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- More than long enough with 1000+ words of prose. Formatting looks fine. Coverage of his life and career seems adequate. Footnotes can be found in expected spots. Apart from a blockquote, Earwig has no complaints. This wikibio looks READY for RD, except that I ain't sure if the source for his death is solid enough (I am not familiar with the Neptune Society as a source.) Can another admin take a look, please? Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's an obituary from the funeral home/cremation provider. Sometimes families forego placing longer obits, or news outlets/other sources take longer to write up something (this was also how Melinda Dillon's death was originally discovered). Connormah (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 09:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
December 17
[edit]
December 17, 2024
(Tuesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Nicholas Chia
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNA
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Robertsky (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The 3rd Catholic Archbishop of Singapore. This was in a resume-ish format before I rewrote into prose and add some sources as well. Still a bit more to go for a minimum ITN pass; putting up here first. There are at least two notable events while he was in the office, which I will add on in the coming days. – robertsky (talk) 12:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Article expanded. – robertsky (talk) 00:31, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: article has been expanded successfully; there seems to be adequate sourced coverage – PaulBetteridge (talk) 07:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 08:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Igor Kirillov
[edit]Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:
- Nominated by Zwerg Nase (talk · give credit)
- Created by o po (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Russian general died this morning in an explosion. Ukrainian responsibility not confirmed yet. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ukraine (SBU) claimed responsibility. Grimes2 (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Article needs a tidy-up before it is postable. There is at least one CN tag. —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - looks good enough. Thanks, Grimes2 ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done fixing those cn tags. Looks good now. Yakikaki (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted – Schwede66 22:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
(Posted) 2024 Port Vila earthquake
[edit]Blurb: A Mw 7.3 earthquake hits Vanuatu's capital Port Vila. (Post)
Alternative blurb: A 7.3 Mw earthquake hits Vanuatu's capital Port Vila.
News source(s): Magnitude 7.4 earthquake strikes near Vanuatu capital, BBC, Reuters, The Guardian, USGS
Credits:
- Nominated by Schwede66 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Borgenland (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: The epicentre is 30 km from Port Vila, and a shallow 7.3 Mw strike will have caused significant damage in a town of 50,000 people. At the moment, there is one reported fatality; the true death number will be much higher. The situation will become much clearer over the next 24 hours. Schwede66 08:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support There has been extensive damage to many buildings in Port Vila. This is the 4th largest earthquake by magnitude, this year. At this point there are at least 6 confirmed casualties. HelloThereQuestionablePerson (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait but lean support per nom. There a lot of unclear points in the article currently but this looks like it has potential to have a large impact ✈ mike_gigs talkcontribs 14:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lean Support- Article is fleshed out and very well cited. My only objection is the lack of coverage on the human impact, both here and in the media. –DMartin 15:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait for the impact to become clearer. There's certainly the potential for this to be a big deal. but at present the news reports are mostly anecdotes and remote seismology. Things should become clearer once the authorities on the island make announcements and those reach the media. Modest Genius talk 15:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Well-sources, no major tags. Article has been developed enough considering Vanuatu's communication is down. Uncommon for an earthquake in Vanuatu to be so destructive. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 17:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - The earthquake has caused quite a lot number of casualties, and it is rare for such a large earthquake to occur in Vanuatu. The references in this article are also good. Bakhos | Let's talk! 18:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: article in good shape and event is notable. Improvements can always be made, of course, but it doesn't need to be able to cross the bar of GA or similar just yet. UndercoverClassicist T·C 19:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Major event and the article looks good enough. Prodrummer619 (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Marking this as ready. Schwede66 03:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 03:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
(Closed) US drone sightings
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Widespread sightings of unidentified drones are reported across the United States. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cbsnews.com/news/drones-new-jersey-what-we-know/
Credits:
- Nominated by Departure– (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Anne drew (talk · give credit), Very Polite Person (talk · give credit) and Chetsford (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Comment why are you nominating if you do not want this to be posted? Please do not try to "game" the system. There is no need to "hear other's opinions" until this is properly nominated (by someone who wants it to be posted). Natg 19 (talk) 00:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I thought, ITN isn't the place for discussion. TansoShoshen (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support if the blurb can be modified to a less affirmative statement like "allegedly unidentified drones" or something like that. While we apparently have RS that confirm drones have been spotted and those drones are unidentified, we don't have any RS that say this is "widespread" (rather, the belief in sightings seems to be what's widespread) and the expert consensus is triangulating toward the idea that almost all of these are misidentification of aircraft. But it is, in fact "in the news" so I suppose meets WP:ITNSIGNIF. Moreover, it's not our job to protect humanity from delusion. Also, thanks to the excellent work of @Anne drew: and @Very Polite Person:, this article is as sober as possible to make it given the sources. Chetsford (talk) 00:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Easy fix for your concern re Blurb:
- Widespread reports of unidentified drones in the United States, beginning in New Jersey.
- How about that? As neutral as you can get and slips Jersey in, as the media/awareness as the main locus of it all. cc @Departure– & @Natg 19. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Easy fix for your concern re Blurb:
- Support. The article is up-to-date and outlines the major facets of this event (reported sightings, investigations, responses, and explanations). It is well referenced using reliable sources. The event is significant politically, drawing commentary from political leaders at every level of government and prompting the introduction of legislation. It has been internationally reported by many newspapers of record. There is relevance outside of the US, with events described as related being reported in the UK and Germany (see the background section). The coverage has been widespread, but also with deep coverage by outlets such as The New York Times, CBS, and The Guardian. The article is of decent quality; although the edits have been coming in rapidly, I think we've kept it fairly organized and balanced. Cheers Chetsford, it's been a pleasure working with you on it :) – Anne drew 01:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support posting to ITN as extremely (very) timely, and with zero indication this is going away--if anything, looking at the news and reports every night, it's accellerating, as nuts as that is to even write. Whatever it is, people are interested in it to where they're forcing Biden and Trump to speak out now (Biden is certainly next--Trump was today). There's no reason to not put it up, so we may as well. The article is extremely thoroughly sourced and nearly boringly written, like a proper article should be. Like @Chetsford said, it's very, very sober. As soon as this started to pick up steam and I noticed the article, that's why I immediately posted it to Fringe theories/Noticeboard (link to thread) for more eyes. I think it's timely, necessary, and for a Frankenstein of an article, shockingly well written already and beyond thoroughly sourced. h/t and a half to @Anne drew for the bad-ass copy-editing (she beat me to it!). 2024 New Jersey drone sightings sails past any scrutiny related to policy. I get some of us think it's nonsense. Maybe it is. But our personal views are always irrelevant to mission. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 01:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose we don't post conspiracy theories to ITN. Scuba 01:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- What's the conspiracy theory? The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Homeland Security and New York Governor confirmed they're real. Not all of them, certainly, but we're past from all levels of government the idea it's all some mass delusion. The WP:RS in the article spell it out. We've been beyond methodical in keeping the article factual against sources. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 01:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- So true! The Iranian mother-ship off the coast is spying on Bergen county! The Drones are real! Scuba 02:01, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- What's the conspiracy theory? The Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Homeland Security and New York Governor confirmed they're real. Not all of them, certainly, but we're past from all levels of government the idea it's all some mass delusion. The WP:RS in the article spell it out. We've been beyond methodical in keeping the article factual against sources. -- Very Polite Person (talk) 01:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose on account of the fact that the only real way to describe the events in question are "something is happening". It doesn't seem that the government believes them to be threatening. I think if you compare to the balloon, that was eventually ascribed as being Chinese, and even if the eventual diplomatic impacts of it were little, it WAS an international affair of sorts. If it's found out that these drones are the work of foreign agents, that's a big deal, but right now the only real impacts we've seen from them, to my knowledge, have been minor airport disruptions, which aren't exactly uncommon anyway. Very possible this ends up being a nothingburger, covered extensively or not. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Given how much wacky conspiracy theories and other nonsense from the extreme political spectrum, this is not a real news story. Should they prove to be anything legit (like the Chinese weather balloon from a few years back), then maybe there's something to post. --Masem (t) 02:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - People have been sighting UFOs for decades. The fact that the news cycle has latched onto these sightings for whatever reason doesn't make them actually notable. –DMartin 04:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Whatever or whoever this is, it’s something. That has drawn the attention of the political, military, civilian and media worlds, the latter putting this story at the front of the news from top to bottom of the media spectrum. Opposers fail to convince that this story is unworthy of ITN, and the article, as noted, is carefully sourced and written from a strong NPOV, a credit to Wikipedia. I suggest a posting admin take the strength, and lack of strength, of the arguments into consideration. “In the News?” Absolutely all over the news, for several cycles now. Jusdafax (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Except that WP is not a news ticker. Just because a story is well-covered in the news does not make it appropriate for ITN, particularly as there's no yet firm explanation for what's going on. Front page is not good for speculative stories that just have happened to catch the media's attention. — Masem (t) 04:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we disagree, that’s all. I don’t for one minute buy the “not a news ticker” argument, with all due respect to you. That could be used on any news item. To quote the main ITN entry “ The "In the news" (ITN) section on the Main Page serves to direct readers to articles that have been substantially updated to reflect recent or current events of wide interest. ITN supports the central purpose of Wikipedia—making a great encyclopedia.” This is the lede paragraph at ITN. And at the end: “ Events are added based on a consensus on the ITN candidates page, using two main criteria: a) the quality of the article, including material added or updated to reflect the recent event, and b) the general significance of the developments.” The quality is good, the significance high, the material updated. Consensus is established by the weight of the discussers, not the number, as you well know. Again, with more due respect, in my opinion all I’m seeing from opposers here is WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- "making a great encyclopedia" is important - the problem is that the drone sightings are questionable right now as an encyclopedic topic per NOTNEWS. There's no indication this is going to be an event that will have enduring coverage yet, because there's tons of speculation of what they are and no immediate threats. If it turns out there were a foreign entity that would lead to diplomatic issues, maybe there's something. But with all the wacky theories and explanations to try to explain them, its like claims of UFO sightings, its interesting but not something that WP should readily be documenting at this point. — Masem (t) 13:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, we disagree, that’s all. I don’t for one minute buy the “not a news ticker” argument, with all due respect to you. That could be used on any news item. To quote the main ITN entry “ The "In the news" (ITN) section on the Main Page serves to direct readers to articles that have been substantially updated to reflect recent or current events of wide interest. ITN supports the central purpose of Wikipedia—making a great encyclopedia.” This is the lede paragraph at ITN. And at the end: “ Events are added based on a consensus on the ITN candidates page, using two main criteria: a) the quality of the article, including material added or updated to reflect the recent event, and b) the general significance of the developments.” The quality is good, the significance high, the material updated. Consensus is established by the weight of the discussers, not the number, as you well know. Again, with more due respect, in my opinion all I’m seeing from opposers here is WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Except that WP is not a news ticker. Just because a story is well-covered in the news does not make it appropriate for ITN, particularly as there's no yet firm explanation for what's going on. Front page is not good for speculative stories that just have happened to catch the media's attention. — Masem (t) 04:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggestion for alternate blurb: Investigations by the U.S. Government and independent experts fail to find anything anomalous related to the 2024 New Jersey drone sightings. References: [2], [3], [4], etc. Chetsford (talk) 05:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose — There is no indication what these objects are; most of them the videos depict planes. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose That some people have become so panicked or conspiratorial that the USA government has had to intervene is not only ridiculous but irrelevant. _-_Alsor (talk) 06:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Has there been a contemporaneous example of mass hysteria that made it onto ITN? Ornithoptera (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose local news Kowal2701 (talk) 07:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait Nothing special seems to have been found so far but investigations are ongoing. In the meantime, I like the story about the murder of crows, which seems more seasonal. Watch the skies! Andrew🐉(talk) 08:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If people with tinfoil hats want to believe that videos of aircraft and Venus (which 95% of these things are) are posing a major threat to the USA, it probably needs to stay on X and other nuthatch meeting places. I suppose the fact that this nonsense has made it into the actual news and the fact that the DHS has said there are a few real sightings makes the story itself somewhat notable even as an exercise in how conspiracy theories spread, but nothing more than that. Black Kite (talk) 08:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose And WP:TROUT to the nominator, enwiki specifically avoids WP:POINT edits. Gotitbro (talk) 08:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose because nothing much has actually happened. Beyond that, if the nominator of an item doesn't want it to go forward to the home page (for instance because new facts come to light, or the story is overtaken by another, related one), we generally close the nomination unless there is an excellent reason not to. I'm therefore calling for a procedural close of this item. Users ought not to make proposals they do not want to see carried out; trying to achieve a negative result so as to establish some kind of benchmark or precedent is, as Gotitbro observes, a violation of WP:POINT; it's also unlikely to succeed, as users generally (correctly) invoke WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS when people try to rely too strongly such precedents. GenevieveDEon (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to disrupt the wiki or anything; from my perspective, I just wrote a neutrally-worded and properly attributed blurb with a built-in oppose vote and that's all. I would have opposed this if and when it was nominated anyway. But I see your point and I'll try to avoid opening nominations for this in the future. I will stand by the point that as of now this event is more or less nothing. Departure– (talk) 13:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's a mystery for sure, but unless/until there's some public announcement of who is responsible or determination that something nefarious is going on, there's no actual impact yet. 'Something unusual happened, but we don't know what it is, who is responsible or what the impact might be' isn't suitable for an ITN blurb. Separately, I find the nomination comments bizarre and counterproductive - if you don't think this should be posted, simply don't nominate it. Seems like a deliberate waste of time. Modest Genius talk 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wait, oppose for now. Until something actually happens, this really shouldn't be on ITN. Keep in mind this isn't affecting my !vote, but 99% of these are almost certainly civilian-operated aircraft, hobbyist drones, or Venus. — BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose and SNOW Close per GenevieveDEon. If the nominator himself opposes the nomination, why is this even up? This has been mere trivia here in Europe (if covered at all). Maybe the news cycle was particularly slow in the US when this emerged. Khuft (talk) 21:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
References
[edit]Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: